Statistical analysis
This section contains the following:
Introduction
The principal features of the statistical analysis of the trial should have
been described in the Statistical Analysis section of the protocol.
This section should include details of the proposed analysis of both
the primary and secondary outcome(s) and provide some information on
how any anticipated analysis problems will be handled. In
general, the analysis of the primary outcome(s) should follow the
intention to treat principle – the participants should remain in the
group to which they were randomised and not analysed according to the treatment
actually received. Any novel statistical techniques should be
referenced in the text. A statistician should write or comment on
the analysis strategy.
In addition to the Statistical Analysis section of the protocol, it is
necessary to describe a statistical analysis plan. This is
usually written as a separate document that is appended to the
protocol. The plan includes a more detailed description of the
principal statistical features stated in the protocol. This plan
can be finalised as the trial progresses, and might require amendment
if unusual features of the data are identified during the analyses.
This may occur when interim results are presented to the Data
Monitoring Committee (DMC).
Things to consider
- Provide details of the proposed analysis for the primary and
secondary outcome(s)
- Give references for any non-standard statistical techniques
- Supply information on how to handle anticipated problems such as
missing values (see Compliance and missing
data)
- Any proposed analyses should correspond to the data required for
the Dummy tables (see Dummy tables)
- Get a statistician involved with the development of this section
Back to top
Scenarios where special considerations apply
Cluster trials
A fundamental assumption of standard statistical methods used to
analyse patient randomised trials is that the outcome for an individual
patient is completely unrelated to that for any other patient – they
are said to be ‘independent’. This assumption is violated, however, in
cluster trials because patients within any one cluster are more likely
to respond in a similar manner. Cluster trials that do not
account for clustering during analysis have artificially extreme
p-values and over narrow confidence intervals increasing the chances of
spuriously significant findings and misleading conclusions. The
statistical analysis section of the protocol should provide specific
details on how to account for the clustering in the data.
Equivalence trials
In equivalence trials, the statistical analysis is generally based on
the use of confidence intervals. The investigator sets
equivalence margins, and if the entire confidence interval lies within
these margins the interventions are said to be equivalent. In
contrast to the parallel group designs described above, the correct
analysis is by treatment received not by intention to treat. The
protocol should state the equivalence margins and specific details on
how to analyse the equivalence trial.
Additional resources
Statistical analysis checklist
This checklist was developed by Dave Sackett, who prepared it for
the forthcoming
3rd edition of Clinical Epidemiology; A Basic Science for Answering
Questions
about Health Care, to be published by Lippincott, Williams &
Wilkins
in 2004.
Back to top
This document provides guidance for the design, conduct, analysis,
and evaluation of clinical trials of an intervention in the context of
its overall clinical development.
Back to top
Dummy tables checklist
Back to top
Epi Info is a public domain software package designed for the global
community of public health practitioners and researchers. It
provides for easy form and database construction, data entry, and
analysis with epidemiologic statistics, maps, and graphs. Within
Epi Info there is an analysis program for producing statistical
analyses
of data, report output and graphs.
Back to top
Further reading
Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics, 3rd Edition.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Kerry SM, Bland JM. Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters. BMJ
1998; 316: 54.
Campbell MK et al Analysis of cluster randomised trials in primary
care. A practical approach. Family Practice; 2000:17;192-196.
Back to top
This page was last updated March 2009.