Clear eligibility criteria should have been discussed and set out in the trial protocol. Typical selection criteria may relate to age, sex, clinical diagnosis, and co-morbid conditions; exclusion criteria are often used to ensure patient safety. They should have been explicitly defined to answer the study question.
Pragmatic RCTs are designed not only to determine whether the
intervention works, but also to describe the circumstances mimicking
clinical practice. To achieve this, pragmatic studies tend to use
wide criteria to include participants with heterogeneous
characteristics, similar to those seen by clinicians in their daily
practice.
Illustrative
example - Single centre trial example: from the BMJ 1999
|
|
Inclusion criteria Consecutive patients admitted after a snake bite and require antivenom serum due to systemic envenomation or severe local envenomation. Exclusion criteria Patients will be excluded from the study if they are;
Antivenom trial - go to publication |
Illustrative example - Multi centre trial example: WHO pre-eclampsia trial |
|
Eligibility criteria
Randomization was conducted during the first ANC visit before 20 weeks of
gestation. It was decided to include all nulliparous women regardless of their
gynaecological history or early pregnancy complications (such as threatened
abortion or hyperemesis gravidarum) to cover a high-risk group most readily
identifiable. Although there are other risk factors such as positive family
history and pre-eclampsia in a previous pregnancy, the screening process to
identify these cases is likely to be cumbersome and will be difficult to
implement given the diverse populations included in the
trial.
WHO Pre-eclampsia trial - go to publication |
Consort diagram showing the flow of participants through each stage of a randomised trial.