Recruitment - Is the participant eligible?

This section contains the following: 


Introduction 

Clear eligibility criteria should have been discussed and set out in the trial protocol.  Typical selection criteria may relate to age, sex, clinical diagnosis, and co-morbid conditions; exclusion criteria are often used to ensure patient safety.  They should have been explicitly defined to answer the study question.

Pragmatic RCTs are designed not only to determine whether the intervention works, but also to describe the circumstances mimicking clinical practice.  To achieve this, pragmatic studies tend to use wide criteria to include participants with heterogeneous characteristics, similar to those seen by clinicians in their daily practice.


Back to top 


Things to consider 

This checklist has been contributed by Dave Sackett. It is in the 3rd edition of Clinical Epidemiology; A Basic Science for Answering Questions about Health Care, published by Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins in 2005.


Back to top  


Illustrative example - Single centre trial example: from the BMJ 1999

Inclusion criteria

Consecutive patients admitted after a snake bite and require antivenom serum due to systemic envenomation or severe local envenomation.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they are;

  • pregnant

  • aged under 12 or over 70 years

  • said they had received antisera, including antivenom serum, in the past

  • had known adverse reactions to adrenaline, atopy, wheezing, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, transient ischaemic attacks, strokes, or unexplained focal neurological signs

  • had received any treatment other than first aid before admission.

  • or if electrocardiography on admission shows ischaemic changes or arrhythmias.

Antivenom trial - go to publication 

Back to top   



Illustrative example - Multi centre trial example: WHO pre-eclampsia trial

Eligibility criteria
Pregnant women attending antenatal care in the participating centres were eligible if the following criteria are met:

  • Gestational age <20 weeks

  • Nulliparous

  • Capable of giving informed consent. (Informed consent for minors will be obtained following country specific age limits)

Randomization was conducted during the first ANC visit before 20 weeks of gestation.  It was decided to include all nulliparous women regardless of their gynaecological history or early pregnancy complications (such as threatened abortion or hyperemesis gravidarum) to cover a high-risk group most readily identifiable.  Although there are other risk factors such as positive family history and pre-eclampsia in a previous pregnancy, the screening process to identify these cases is likely to be cumbersome and will be difficult to implement given the diverse populations included in the trial.

Exclusion criteria
Women were excluded under the following conditions:

  • History of urolithiasis or symptoms suggestive of urolithiasis or any renal disease such as haematuria, flank pain, etc.

  • Parathyroid disease.

  • Blood pressure ≥ 140mmHg systolic or ≥ 90mmHg diastolic, receiving treatment or had history of hypertension.

  • Taking diuretics or any digoxin treatment.

  • Taking phenytoin or tetracyclines.

WHO Pre-eclampsia trial - go to publication  


Back to top  

Additional resources

Consort flow diagram

Consort diagram showing the flow of participants through each stage of a randomised trial. 


Back to top   

Further reading

Pocock SJ Clinical trials a practical approach
MRC 2004 Research involving human participants in developing countries.
Fergusson D et al. Post randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 2002; 325:652-654

Back to top  


This page was last updated on 31st October  2007