|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tools -> Policy makers ->Structured Summaries -> Glossary |
| A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M |
| N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z |
N of 1 randomised trial
A randomised trial in an individual to determine the optimum treatment
for that individual. The individual is given repeated administrations
of experimental and control interventions (or of two or more
experimental treatments), with thethe treatments being randomised.
Negative association
See association.
Negative study
A term often used to refer to a study
with results that either do not indicate a beneficial effect of treatment or that have not
reached statistical significance. The
term can generate confusion because it can refer to either statistical significance or the direction of effect. Studies often have multiple outcomes, the criteria for
classifying studies as ‘negative’ are not always
clear and, in the case of studies of risk or undesirable effects, ‘negative’ studies are ones
that do not show a harmful effect.
NNH
See number
needed to treat to harm.
NNT
See number
needed to treat to benefit.
NNTb
See number
needed to treat to benefit.
NNTh
See number
needed to treat to harm.
Non-experimental study
See observational
study
Non-inferiority
trial
A trial designed to determine whether
the effect of a new treatment is not worse than a standard treatment by more than a pre-specified
amount. A one-sided version of an equivalence
trial.
Non-randomised study
Any quantitative study estimating the effectiveness of an intervention (harm or benefit) that does not use randomisation to allocate units to comparison groups (including studies where
‘allocation’ occurs in the course of usual
treatment
decisions or peoples’ choices, i.e. studies usually called
‘observational’). To avoid ambiguity, the term
should be
substantiated using a description of the type of question being
addressed. For example, a 'non-randomised intervention study' is
typically a comparative study of an experimental intervention against
some control intervention (or no intervention) that is not a randomised controlled trial. There are
many possible types of non-randomised intervention study, including cohort studies, case-control studies, controlled
before-and-after studies, interrupted-time-series
studies and controlled
trials that do not use appropriate randomisation strategies
(sometimes called quasi-randomised studies).
Null hypothesis
The statistical hypothesis that one variable (e.g. which treatment a study participant was allocated to receive) has no association with another variable or
set of variables (e.g. whether or not a study participant died), or
that two or more population distributions do
not differ from one another. In simplest terms, the null
hypothesis states that the factor of interest (e.g. treatment) has no
impact on outcome (e.g.
risk of death).
Number needed
to treat
See number needed to treat to benefit
Number
needed to treat to benefit
An estimate of how many people need
to receive a treatment before one person would experience a beneficial outcome.
For example, if you need to give a stroke prevention drug to 20 people
before one stroke is prevented, then the number needed to treat to
benefit for that stroke prevention drug is 20. The NNTb is estimated as
the reciprocal of the absolute risk
difference. (Also called NNT, NNTB, number needed
to treat.)
Number needed to treat to harm
A number needed to
treat to benefit associated with a harmful effect. It is an
estimate of how many people need to receive a treatment before one more person would experience a harmful outcome or one fewer person would experience a beneficial outcome. (Also called
NNH, NNTH, number needed to harm.) See also number needed to treat to
benefit.